Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kim Halliday's avatar

I’ve been working on The Line We Crossed with Liz, but I wanted to make an observation. The judiciary, as seen over and over in the film, hold defendants from JSO in contempt of court if they speak in court about climate change or their deeply held moral grounds for action. This seems somewhat at odds with the same judiciary saying that each person found guilty for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance will be sentenced according to the context of their particular situation. That just seems an acknowledgement that this Act is poorly written and unjust. You’d hope that would be enough to repeal it, but the Labour government are too busy to fo that, apparently.

No posts

Ready for more?